Toronto: Banning protests you don't like is not the answer

Thursday, November 09, 2017
3 reactions

z_quds.JPG

Pro- and anti- Palestine demonstrators square off at Toronto's annual Al-Quds protest on June 24, 2017. Photo: Kevin Metcalf

CJFE is deeply concerned by an administrative inquiry being conducted by Toronto Ward 10 Councillor James Pasternak. According to a report from CTV, Pasternak has asked the deputy city manager to assess the feasibility of banning ‘hate-sponsored’ rallies from city property. Some proposed remedies include the power to issue trespass orders, fine for extra police services or possibly to freeze bank accounts. Pasternak’s inquiry will be presented to the city’s executive committee before it is debated.

Pasternak acknowledges that the Supreme Court of Canada has set limits on speech through Section 1 of the Charter. He also acknowledges limitations established on speech subject to section 319 of the Canadian Criminal Code. Despite this, he suggests that the city should have more authority to set further limits.  Pasternak did not provide a definition of ‘hate-sponsored’ events but his CTV interview implies he would seek to “prohibit rallies that are inciting hatred or violence.”

CJFE staff have attended far-right rallies in Toronto since they became commonplace in February 2017, in order to provide the public with information about these events, but also to understand the context in which the rallies are taking place and to provide support for people engaged in free expression. While CJFE unequivocally supports the free expression rights of all groups, we have frequently been outspoken in opposition to hateful ideals and individuals.

Video: CJFE staff were in attendance at a recent October 21 far-right 'anti-Trudeau' rally in Nathan Phillips Square.

CJFE categorically opposes the suggestion that the city of Toronto should use legislative means to prevent rallies from taking place on city property. We are also concerned that Pasternak’s definition of ‘inciting hatred and violence’ may be intended for a far broader application than demonstrations by far-right groups. Pasternak was nominated for Torontoist’s 2012 ‘Villains’ award for his role in blocking the protest group ‘Queers Against Israeli Apartheid’ from marching in Toronto Pride, and has equated peaceful civil society advocacy with the promotion of hatred. Human rights advocacy in diaspora communities is a growing target for censorship, and this suppression is frequently justified by those who deliberately blur the line between criticism of the state of Israel and hate for Jewish people.

A responsible role for the city of Toronto in countering hate would be to invite the public to challenge hateful ideas rather than exploring the application of force of law to legislate them away. In mid-August, the mayor of London, Ontario, followed this course by calling on Londoners to ‘stand up against hate’ in advance of a planned white supremacist rally. We call on the City of Toronto’s Executive Committee to explore alternatives to politically motivated censorship, to reject this inquiry and defend the Charter rights to free expression and assembly.


 

A copy of this letter was sent to Mayor John Tory and Ward 10 Councillor James Pasternak.

What do you think?

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Edward Graydon
    commented 2021-01-24 11:08:02 -0500
    What do I think? I think it was to be expected to some degree and maybe rightfully so, although it holds similarities to how the Chinese CCP also dealt with the issue.I am not outraged by government but more confused by what the government is trying to accomplish !

    I think it would have been safer to express yourself through written word but that as been shut down by the CBC and other online media who have decided to censor input! That is counter productive .as on one hand the government has advocated that people stay home regardless if they feel angst in regards to the lockdown but at the same time make it difficult to allow written opinion by those that have decided to write what they have to say rather than participate in first person at a protest!

    Basically I think it is a measure of control being taken by the government to change public behaviour and thinking on the subject of Covid 19 virus and future public input into Canadian society!
    I have no idea how one can possible express ones self, if your input will be censored and deemed unworthy while at the same time forbidden to protest in person? I do not believe it can be! So as much as we are told we live in a democratic society ,it now seems that is a actual fallacy ! All communication as been shout down on this issue and your voice regardless of civility when stated is being monitored and criticised by those that might not even live in this country .

    The government should allow all conversation to be allowed publicly visible if one uses there real name and not a moniker or alias and allow the poster to take responsibility in the public sphere what I mean by this is that for years the government of Canada has been trying to clamp down on hate speech ? Personally I think that premise was intended to halt free speech and done on a false pretence in order to gain control over free speech including protests .But when you cannot protest in person and your written input is taken down regardless of truth and first hand knowledge .I cannot reply in any other way but to say, we are being taken over by forces who don’t care about what you or I have to say.
  • Jayson McEwen
    commented 2018-07-04 04:37:52 -0400
    Fine.

    Apply for a permit next year.

    See what happens.
  • Iraj Gardner
    commented 2017-11-09 18:32:36 -0500
    If Councillor Pasternak wants to tackle hateful or violent demonstrations in this city, he needs to start by calling a public inquiry into the behaviour and actions of the pro-Nazi Toronto Police at these demonstrations. The August 21 demo is far from the first in which Toronto Police acted as personal stormtroopers for the neo-Nazis and other hate groups. Their biased approach to policing at these events only leads to escalation of violence and people getting hurt and arrested who shouldn’t be.

    Pics and video as well as witness accounts clearly demonstrate that the police on Aug 21 were under orders to protect the Nazis, turn a blind eye to their violence, and interfere with and arrest counter protesters. That is why they were all in a line with their backs turned to the Nazis, when some should have been facing each side to watch for any violence. They even stole sound equipment from counter protesters using the “noise by-law” excuse while permitting the Nazis to continue using their (louder) equipment. The officer in charge that day is a hardcore conservative who has run for political office three times. Biased much? These cops need to learn to leave their political, personal and racial biases at home, and those incapable of doing so should not be assigned to crowd control duty. Toronto police behaviour in crowds is a disgrace, and this needs to be dealt with before their lack of professionalism causes someone to be seriously hurt or killed.

    These cops are paid by the taxpayers to be serving and protecting everyone – not just gangs of racists, white supremacists and neo-Nazis.